证明
Lemma 1 ([Leading coefficients and low cooperations]). For each m≥1 , I_m is an…Lemma 4 ([A comparison in three cochain degrees]). Suppose s≥1 , w<u_ m+1 , and…观点
The first two inequalities are the rearrangement of w≥s . Here u_4=1 , 028 , 262 , 820, 2u_4=2 , 056 , 525 , 640<p^4=1 , 036 , 488 , 922 , 561, so the remaining inequalities in Equation hold at the fixed prime. For a cochain length d∈s-1,s,s+1 , a coefficient containing v_4 would leave at most k weight for d≥qk>k reduced factors. It therefore cannot occur. A bar containing t_4 would leave at most k weight for the other d-1≥qk-1>k bars, and likewise cannot occur. Higher generators exceed the weight bound. The remaining coproducts are additive by Lemma 1 ([Leading coefficients and low cooperations]); equivalently, apply Lemma 4 ([A comparison in three cochain degrees]). This identifies both adjacent differentials and proves the cohomology assertion.